From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 27 09:36:48 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44E0106564A for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C487D8FC12 for ; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF8846B52; Thu, 27 Nov 2008 04:36:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:36:48 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Jia-Shiun Li In-Reply-To: <1d6d20bc0811260656t101ddb0eu35296ac973c6ba10@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <1d6d20bc0811260656t101ddb0eu35296ac973c6ba10@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_le unit number change? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 09:36:49 -0000 On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Jia-Shiun Li wrote: > I use vmware to run freebsd. > > recent update of 8-current changed the unit number of the virtual network > interface, an emulated if_le. usually the unit number should start from 0 > ,namely le0. But after updating the source, le0 becomes le1. This makes > interface name mismatching that in rc.conf. I checked the commit log but > there seems nothing related in sys/dev/le. So should this be caused by > something else? > > The kernels dated 11/5 & 11/26. Just ran into an identical problem with HEAD on VMWare here as well. It appears to work fine as le1, which is reassuring, but the unit numbering change is worrying. I may get a chance to do some binary searching today, but we'll see. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge