From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 15:05:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B5D3119 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no (smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no [IPv6:2001:700:1100:1:200:ff:fe00:b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.fagskolen.gjovik.no", Issuer "Fagskolen i Gj??vik" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C5190AF0 for ; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:05:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.fig.ol.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s37F5WV6080951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:05:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost) by mail.fig.ol.no (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s37F5WHb080948; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:05:32 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@fagskolen.gjovik.no) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.fig.ol.no: trond owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 17:05:32 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= Sender: Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no To: Chris Nehren Subject: Re: Note for those pulling in new ZFS feature flags In-Reply-To: <20140407145511.GA16747@behemoth> Message-ID: References: <20140407135421.GA16385@behemoth> <20140407145511.GA16747@behemoth> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) Organization: Fagskolen Innlandet OpenPGP: url=http://fig.ol.no/~trond/trond.key MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on mail.fig.ol.no Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:05:39 -0000 On Mon, 7 Apr 2014 10:55-0400, Chris Nehren wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 15:36:21 +0100, Tom Evans wrote: > > > I solved this by re-running `gpart bootcode` for the afflicted > > > drives. This was a bit trying, though, as my workstation is the > > > only FreeBSD machine I have readily available. So, for those > > > upgrading their zpools, be careful and remember to fix the > > > bootcode if you're using ZFS for the root filesystem. > > > > ISTR that "zpool upgrade" will also remind you to do this if bootfs is > > true for the pool you upgraded. > > > > Also, it is always worth having around a bootable memstick available > > with the zfs code you are actually running in order to use as a > > recovery disk in circumstances like this. > > I'm fairly certain there was no such message, or I would have > dutifully done what it said. I definitely do know there is a > message of that kind when attaching a disk to a mirror, and I've > followed through there without issue. See: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/stable/10/cddl/contrib/opensolaris/cmd/zpool/zpool_main.c?view=markup#l4992 Consider this a lesson learned. Yes, I too was bitten by this once, but never again. ;-) Luckily, I recovered using a snapshot image. Whenever I upgrade a ZFS system which has a ZFS boot pool, I always upgrade the bootblocks even if I don't upgrade the boot pool to include some new cool zpool feature. Nevertheless, it's still handy to have a recent snapshot available on physical media or as an image file at least. -- +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Vennlig hilsen, | Best regards, | | Trond Endrestøl, | Trond Endrestøl, | | IT-ansvarlig, | System administrator, | | Fagskolen Innlandet, | Gjøvik Technical College, Norway, | | tlf. mob. 952 62 567, | Cellular...: +47 952 62 567, | | sentralbord 61 14 54 00. | Switchboard: +47 61 14 54 00. | +-------------------------------+------------------------------------+ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 7 15:29:21 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB4F48CD; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "wonkity.com", Issuer "wonkity.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E7BBD2C; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s37FTDES036598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.8/8.14.8/Submit) with ESMTP id s37FTDMR036595; Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: How to remove X11 support and all ports options depend on X11 In-Reply-To: <5342402D.6070306@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <5342402D.6070306@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 07 Apr 2014 09:29:13 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Apr 2014 15:29:22 -0000 On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > 'WITHOUT_X11' is obsolete. What > you want nowadays is: > > OPTIONS_UNSET+= x11 Shouldn't that be uppercase X11?