From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jan 2 16: 5:16 2001 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 2 16:05:15 2001 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from shag.xpays.com (shag.xpays.com [209.164.24.73]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E879237B400 for ; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 16:05:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from adsl-63-193-219-100.dsl.snfc21 (adsl-63-193-219-100.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.193.219.100]) by shag.xpays.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA32045; Tue, 2 Jan 2001 16:05:02 -0800 Message-Id: <200101030005.QAA32045@shag.xpays.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2001 16:12:14 -0800 From: Brian To: Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: half-life port In-Reply-To: <000901c0744c$128c6060$7ccc29d0@thestanfields.com> References: <000901c0744c$128c6060$7ccc29d0@thestanfields.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.3.20 (GTK+ 1.2.8; FreeBSD 4.1-RELEASE; i386) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We have a office counter-strike server running on FBSD 4.2 with no problems. It seems to run just as well as it did before when it was on Linux. Hope this helps, Brian On Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:39:24 -0600 "Eric D. Stanfield" wrote: > I know there's a half-life port with counterstrike out but it requires linux > emulation to be loaded. I'm just curious as to what effect having to run > this under emulation has on system requirements and performance versus a > native port of the hl server and if there is anyone working on a native *bsd > port. > > Eric > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message