From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu May  9 12:08:41 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA04981
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 May 1996 12:08:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id MAA04973
          Thu, 9 May 1996 12:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.12/1.2) id MAA12873; Thu, 9 May 1996 12:08:35 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199605091908.MAA12873@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: Re: Anyone working on ATM support?
To: jmb@freefall.freebsd.org (Jonathan M. Bresler)
Date: Thu, 9 May 1996 12:08:34 -0700 (MST)
Cc: pat@transarc.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199605071738.KAA20770@freefall.freebsd.org> from "Jonathan M. Bresler" at May 7, 96 10:38:34 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

It seems that Jonathan M. Bresler said:
> Pat Barron wrote:
> > If anyone is working on ATM on FreeBSD, could you drop me a note?  I'd
> > be interested in hearing about what vendor's interfaces you're working
> > with, what you plan to do about signalling, etc....
> 
> 	try freebsd-atm@freebsd.org

FWIW, the a snippet appeared in one of my trade journals recently begins:

"A newly proposed protocol may enable the Internet to deliver ATM cells
encapsulated within its IP packets.  If adopted, it would give any
Ethernet-capable desktop the ability to receive ATM without any 
specialized hardware. ..."