Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:19:32 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: RELENG_6 devfs problem
Message-ID:  <20060113071932.GA62526@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20060111210323.G28748@fledge.watson.org>
References:  <200601051154.32092.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> <20060111210323.G28748@fledge.watson.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:06:32PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
>=20
> On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>=20
> >I just installed the latest mgetty and ran it, then found it wasn't=20
> >talking to my modem so I disabled it in /etc/ttys and killed the process.
> >
> >I ran fstat /dev/cuad0 to check it was dead and fstat got stuck in the=
=20
> >devfs state. It seems that everything else was stuck too and now the=20
> >machine is alive but not very functional.
> >
> >What can I do to try and debug it?
>=20
> Do you use devfs rule sets?  I fixed a bug a week or so ago in devfs_rule=
.c=20
> in HEAD, and MFC'd the fix today.  The symptoms are much what you describ=
e,=20
> and occur when an invalid rule is proposed -- the right error is returned=
,=20
> but a lock is not released resulting in it being unavailable when process=
es=20
> try to access device nodes, resulting in eventual deadlock.  It's=20
> devfs_rule.c:1.21 in HEAD, and devfs_rule.c:1.14.2.3 in RELENG_6.  I beli=
ve=20
> the bug does not exist in RELENG_5, as there were significant changes in=
=20
> devfs locking for 6.0, and those haven't been merged to RELENG_5.
>=20
> If this doesn't fix it, the normal debugging steps apply -- compile in DD=
B,=20
> BREAK_TO_DEBUGGER, and WITNESS.  When the wedge occurs, dump the lock sta=
te=20
> (show alllocks), and we'll see if we can track down the problem.

I don't use rulesets, and I encountered the same problem when using
minicom to talk to serial ports.  I didn't yet have time to debug it,
but I can provide instructions for repeating it.

Kris

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDx1SDWry0BWjoQKURAvR2AJ4h/Lhhhpda6WrVXuSof3wHTZXzGACgry3U
V0qtOsHC0J/xQ4L5Q4YFAzY=
=ml5h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060113071932.GA62526>