From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 2 02:09:01 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0B5B106564A for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 02:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (202-172-126-254.cpe.qld-1.comcen.com.au [202.172.126.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818138FC1C for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 02:09:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rock_on_the_web@comcen.com.au) Received: from [192.168.0.175] (unknown [192.168.0.175]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684614065 for ; Tue, 2 Dec 2008 08:44:12 +1000 (EST) From: Da Rock To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20081201142212.5cddd312@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <002701c9538a$10ff0330$005bfb48@harryveltman> <20081201142212.5cddd312@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:44:22 +1000 Message-Id: <1228171462.4523.0.camel@laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.3 (2.12.3-5.fc8) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Which FreeBSD is best for my PC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 02:09:01 -0000 On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 14:22 +0000, RW wrote: > On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 23:54:38 -0800 > "Harry Veltman" wrote: > > > Which version and GUI will work best on the internet with my AT > > Pentium II 350MHz x86-based PC? Some web sites require Flash Player > > 8 or higher, > > If flash is important to you then I'd suggest you run windows firefox > under wine. Native Adobe Flash support is apparently working again in > 7.1, but it's only just been restored as being broken for years. And by > all accounts the linux flash-plugin isn't perfect even in Linux. > > > and some require 128-bit encryption I think, but doesn't > > 40-bit encryption process data 3 times faster? How many bit > > encryption is the various versions of FreeBSD? Thanks. > > All the supported versions of FreeBSD should have a wide range of > ciphers available on browsers. IMO it's not really worth using > ciphers below 128 bits. 128 bit is probably safe from the NSA, 40 > bits could easily be broken on a pc. Are you sure about the NSA part? :P