From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 7 09:00:24 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43698106564A for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:00:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D9B8FC08 for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 09:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvg11 with SMTP id 11so362798pvg.13 for ; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 02:00:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=VVFzO/nY9Lh8MxM59YgXnvMtcdxwITh5tg6k9OswGow=; b=rtVPmZ5lwaGtsv+WxjK4Xua6QI4bOnq1Samj1iDywft5RGt7V0KjaXledOWtaB3Uwi pW5yQBA2kK0PcZz5hY3TncJ2t8rdQ9k6dZddo7K8J8mtl3k0r4i8vstPt5Ic04GasoTr ynLOk2sf9Zk/bocx64UNYnBkHE1Z2i3/Qh5Cg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.112.15 with SMTP id k15mr300444wfc.405.1310027493689; Thu, 07 Jul 2011 01:31:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.156.20 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Jul 2011 01:31:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4E11ECE2.9050402@freebsd.org> References: <4E11ECE2.9050402@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 04:31:33 -0400 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:15:27 +0000 Cc: Subject: Re: Jails: Setting different times in jails X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 09:00:24 -0000 > possibly achievable in libc? I don't know. Where else would it be done? stat, utimes, gettimeofday, clock_gettime, adjtime, etc and their variations. I've not checked what currently happens, but I don't think root in a jail should be able to set any kernel time parameters, absent a syscall that says it should. > in any case file this idea somewhere.. :-) Don't know here either. I looked at the lists and hackers seemed closest. I'll bcc current. Someone could maybe todo-wiki this thread as low hanging fruit. Cheers.