From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 23:27:12 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6B3516A404 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (ns1.feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9407013C49D for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from ns1.feral.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l29NR2up061984; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:27:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (mjacob@localhost) by ns1.feral.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l29NR2FJ061981; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:27:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mjacob@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: ns1.feral.com: mjacob owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2007 15:27:02 -0800 (PST) From: mjacob@freebsd.org To: Ivan Voras In-Reply-To: <45F1EB35.6020303@fer.hr> Message-ID: <20070309151901.L61859@ns1.feral.com> References: <45F18183.7050405@FreeBSD.org> <45F182F2.10604@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091240q65d45300u836121454d799c64@mail.gmail.com> <45F1C77C.8010103@fer.hr> <70e8236f0703091413o473db67fr451e3be49c44b025@mail.gmail.com> <20070309142918.V61513@ns1.feral.com> <45F1E27A.7090302@fer.hr> <20070309150157.L61706@ns1.feral.com> <45F1EB35.6020303@fer.hr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC request: QLogic 24xx FibreChannel controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mjacob@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:27:12 -0000 On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, Ivan Voras wrote: > Matthew Jacob wrote: >> Well, based upon the serial number they aren't the same disk then. > > I have no problems with accepting that, but can you offer some > explanations for the behaviour: > >>> But they are the same device - if I write something on one of them, I >>> can read it from the other. I don't know the underlying hardware. I'm beginning to smell something wrong here. Boot with hint.isp.0.debug=0x105 set and send me the boot output, would you?