From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 28 22:11:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBBCA37B404 for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:11:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net (falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1140543F3F for ; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:11:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from parv_fm@mailsent.net) Received: from sdn-ap-022dcwashp0035.dialsprint.net ([63.191.160.35] helo=moo.holy.cow) by falcon.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 18z9Z8-0005xc-00; Fri, 28 Mar 2003 22:11:43 -0800 Received: by moo.holy.cow (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C7DCAE03C; Sat, 29 Mar 2003 01:14:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 01:14:46 -0500 From: parv To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20030329061446.GA11628@moo.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20030328052350.GA18971@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030328182026.GA7123@moo.holy.cow> <20030328222716.GC23305@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030328222716.GC23305@rot13.obsecurity.org> cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BROKEN ports scheduled for removal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2003 06:11:52 -0000 in message <20030328222716.GC23305@rot13.obsecurity.org>, wrote Kris Kennaway thusly... > > On Fri, Mar 28, 2003 at 01:20:26PM -0500, parv wrote: > > > > > > The following ports have been marked BROKEN for at least > > > 4 months and are scheduled for removal after May 1 2003. > > > > Kris, would there be any chance of removing a port which doesn't > > build & has a pr pending for almost an year? ... > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/37730 > > It builds fine on stock 4.x, but fails on 5.0. I'll mark it > BROKEN on 5.0. I can't think of an easy way to indicate that it > does not compile with newer perl versions. We probably need > a BUILD_CONFLICTS directive similar to the runtime (package) > conflicts patches I am testing. Ah! Thanks Kris. I wouldn't have any chance of knowing the above w/o your "BROKEN ports scheduled for removal" message. Now i know that i had been chasing a "partial bug", i can sleep now better. I withdraw my request to remove the editors/nvi-perl port. - parv --