Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:38:20 +0200 From: <Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl> To: <dcs@tcoip.com.br>, <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: <ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: ipfw2 vs. ipfw1 and 4.7 Message-ID: <C6304883FB11E347AD4958D3F14EC00AE892A4@ing.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:dcs@tcoip.com.br] > Sent: 01 October 2002 21:19 > I find it EXTREMELY inconvenient that 4.7 gets released with a KNOWN=20 > bug, that was corrected in -current before we were halfway into the = 4.7=20 > freeze. Even more so when the change does not affect *any* default=20 > installation, because the feature must be explicitly enabled before = this=20 > code gets even installed. inconvenient? How about contributing? Most contributers are volunteers you know..... -D -----------------------------------------------------------------=0A= ATTENTION:=0A= The information in this electronic mail message is private and=0A= confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you=0A= receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that=0A= any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this=0A= message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by=0A= reply transmission and delete the message without copying or=0A= opening it.=0A= =0A= Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known.=0A= If this message contains password-protected attachments, the=0A= files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain.=0A= Always scan attachments before opening them.=0A= ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6304883FB11E347AD4958D3F14EC00AE892A4>