Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:38:20 +0200 From: <Danny.Carroll@mail.ing.nl> To: <dcs@tcoip.com.br>, <rizzo@icir.org> Cc: <ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: RE: ipfw2 vs. ipfw1 and 4.7 Message-ID: <C6304883FB11E347AD4958D3F14EC00AE892A4@ing.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: Daniel C. Sobral [mailto:dcs@tcoip.com.br] > Sent: 01 October 2002 21:19 > I find it EXTREMELY inconvenient that 4.7 gets released with a KNOWN > bug, that was corrected in -current before we were halfway into the 4.7 > freeze. Even more so when the change does not affect *any* default > installation, because the feature must be explicitly enabled before this > code gets even installed. inconvenient? How about contributing? Most contributers are volunteers you know..... -D ----------------------------------------------------------------- ATTENTION: The information in this electronic mail message is private and confidential, and only intended for the addressee. Should you receive this message by mistake, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, reproduction, distribution or use of this message is strictly prohibited. Please inform the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or opening it. Messages and attachments are scanned for all viruses known. If this message contains password-protected attachments, the files have NOT been scanned for viruses by the ING mail domain. Always scan attachments before opening them. ----------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ipfw" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C6304883FB11E347AD4958D3F14EC00AE892A4>