From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 25 23:31:58 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA22848 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:31:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from narcissus.ml.org (root@brosenga.Pitzer.edu [134.173.120.201]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA22835 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:31:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ben@localhost) by narcissus.ml.org (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id XAA12300; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:31:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:31:51 -0800 (PST) From: Snob Art Genre To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" cc: dg@root.com, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The jump to 3 In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970326011251.00d3e4ac@mixcom.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Wed, 26 Mar 1997, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > At 06:50 AM 3/25/97 -0800, David Greenman wrote: > >>If this was asked and answered before I do apologize to everyone. > >> > >>Im just curious - why after stepping 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 (etc) is freeBSD going > >>to 3.0? > > > > The 3.0 release will have SMP support and this is a major change in > >technology that needs a bump in the major version number. > > What does SMP stand for? Symmetric Multi-Processing. > I'm acronym'd out right now. *sympathy* Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."