From owner-freebsd-perl@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 11:24:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4C8E16A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.elvandar.org (redqueen.elvandar.org [217.148.169.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE6E43D5D for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from remko@elvandar.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.elvandar.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6099E295471; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.elvandar.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (redqueen.elvandar.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46064-02; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41553948.1030208@elvandar.org> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:24 +0200 From: Remko Lodder User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pat Lashley References: <20040924043002.Q78840@prime.gushi.org> <2CE7048C26D5B2A38706C484@vanvoght.phoenix.volant.org> <861CEAA9963517079275A510@[192.168.1.5]> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at elvandar.org cc: perl@freebsd.org cc: "Dan Mahoney, System Admin" cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org cc: Mathieu Arnold cc: spamassassin-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD port of SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (continued) X-BeenThere: freebsd-perl@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: maintainer of a number of perl-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:24:44 -0000 Pat Lashley wrote: > --On Saturday, September 25, 2004 08:59:03 +0200 Mathieu Arnold > Hi Pat, and the rest! > > That seems like an awfully short transition period. Why not > a separate 3.0 port for a while; with the old one being deprecated? > Then remove the 2.64 port once the dependant ports have been updated > and in the field long enough for some serious testing? > I agree with this, i think we should add a new port for the SA3 version. Perhaps even name it p5-Mail-SpamAssassin and rename the 'old' version to p5-Mail-SpamAssassin2 or something and indeed place a little pkg-message that this port is not being actively maintained anymore since "$issuelist" and refer to the new version. Or something similiar ;) just my 0.02E (Europe.. ;)) Grt Remko > > > -Pat -- Kind regards, Remko Lodder |remko@elvandar.org Reporter DSINet |remko@dsinet.org Projectleader Mostly-Harmless |remko@mostly-harmless.nl Founder Tienervaders |remko@tienervaders.org