From owner-freebsd-security Tue Jun 5 2:28:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (diskworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.189]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35E2F37B405 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2001 02:28:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 714 invoked by uid 1000); 5 Jun 2001 09:27:26 -0000 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 12:27:26 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: "Heimes, Rene" Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: security log file parser / ids Message-ID: <20010605122726.A665@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: "Heimes, Rene" , freebsd-security@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from rh@com-con.net on Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 10:24:42AM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 10:24:42AM +0100, Heimes, Rene wrote: > hiho! > > i am searching for a parser that parses security logs from ipfw-made up > logs. anyone got a hint? > (btw: what about ipfw firewalls - outdated? what would be better? > ipchains? help!) Is there any reason to consider ipfw outdated? Or are you just asking if it is? In that case, IMHO, no, it isn't. G'luck, Peter -- This sentence every third, but it still comprehensible. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message