From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 20 21:40:52 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FEEF106564A for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rink@rink.nu) Received: from mx1.rink.nu (gloom.rink.nu [213.34.49.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9BA78FC12 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rink@rink.nu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E6B6D453; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:42:16 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rink.nu Received: from mx1.rink.nu ([213.34.49.2]) by localhost (gloom.rink.nu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id URRnmFxzWL2O; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mx1.rink.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA2D06D450; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:42:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:42:11 +0200 From: Rink Springer To: Kostik Belousov Message-ID: <20080820214211.GH33396@rink.nu> References: <747dc8f30808201223i46ba04daw34c267574ba7cc99@mail.gmail.com> <20080820201226.GI99951@hoeg.nl> <20080820203238.GF1803@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080820203238.GF1803@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: Renato Botelho , Ed Schouten , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: 8.0-CURRENT built on 08/20 crashing with HTT enabled X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:40:52 -0000 On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 11:32:38PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:12:26PM +0200, Ed Schouten wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > * Renato Botelho wrote: > > > kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled > > > > I already spoke with Renato privately and one thing that concerns me: > > shouldn't we normally get a panic when receiving this? > > No, there are several possibilities for the situation to arise in the > kernel. The fact that page fault got handled is interesting, it could be > that some paged memory is accessed too early in the boot sequence (guess). > You may add kdb_backtrace() after printf() there, it might show enough > information to understand the issue. Revision 181938 should fix this - Kip just committed it, it was a small oversight. -- Rink P.W. Springer - http://rink.nu "Anyway boys, this is America. Just because you get more votes doesn't mean you win." - Fox Mulder