From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 13 22:55:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D0516A4CF for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp11.wanadoo.fr (smtp11.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C33D43D2F for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:55:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7ED9A1C0009A for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:55:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from pix.atkielski.com (ASt-Lambert-111-2-1-3.w81-50.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.50.80.3]) by mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 64FD31C00095 for ; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:55:24 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20050213225524413.64FD31C00095@mwinf1103.wanadoo.fr Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:55:16 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <591901175.20050213235516@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> References: <420FCA6C.7070604@makeworld.com> <1987008862.20050213232914@wanadoo.fr> <65856299.20050213233912@wanadoo.fr> <20050214004601.0150177a@it.buh.tecnik93.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: An observation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:55:27 -0000 Ion-Mihai Tetcu writes: > BTW, there's enough MUAs that allow one to map keys combinations to > reply-all, reply-list, reply-sender. MUAs allow lots of things, especially the better ones. MTAs do likewise. > So you choose to disobey more that one thing from our mailing lists > rules :-( No. I've discovered that the "reply-to" is redirected traffic from advocacy to questions, however, and I've corrected that. It was not clear from the preceding posts that this was the problem. -- Anthony