From owner-freebsd-bugs  Wed Oct 23 12:40:16 1996
Return-Path: owner-bugs
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA04886
          for bugs-outgoing; Wed, 23 Oct 1996 12:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from scrappy@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id MAA04874;
          Wed, 23 Oct 1996 12:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 1996 12:40:14 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy>
Message-Id: <199610231940.MAA04874@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: darrylo@sr.hp.com, scrappy, freebsd-bugs
Subject: Re: bin/1547
Sender: owner-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Synopsis: ncrcontrol won't work with FAILSAFE kernel

State-Changed-From-To: closed-open
State-Changed-By: scrappy
State-Changed-When: Wed Oct 23 12:39:42 PDT 1996
State-Changed-Why: 

It's obviously still broken.   A struct depends on MAX_TARGET which
depends on SCSI_NCR_DFLT_TAGS which depends on FAILSAFE.  I tested
this.  It is broken :-).

I have to use the equivalent of FAILSAFE here for a Toshiba MK547FB
boot drive, but I didn't notice the problem because I changed the
source to define SCSI_NCR_DEFLT_TAGS as 0 before FAILSAFE existed,
and have never used FAILSAFE.

Bruce