From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 11:55:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8535716A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:55:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao12.cox.net (lakermmtao12.cox.net [68.230.240.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4F043D1F for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:55:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.70.216]) by lakermmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050404115536.QOXN2476.lakermmtao12.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 07:55:36 -0400 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j34Btbt6029029; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:55:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 06:55:32 -0500 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-ID: <20050404065532.040c1559@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> References: <20050404073532.GA13922@localhost> <20050404081350.GA9048@lothlorien.nagual.st> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: AMD64 optimization on FreeBSD 5.4 i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 11:55:42 -0000 On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 10:13:51 +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > > Don't have an answer to /your/ question, but mine is related (I > think). Is it still advisable to have "-O -pipe" in /etc/make.conf? > I have a duron 800. Does the "-O2" flag give more errors or is it > better than using the -O? -O2 is still iffy for certain architectures, but I believe it's OK now for i386. Go for it. :-) -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"