From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Nov 15 1: 0:49 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mail-relay.eunet.no (mail-relay.eunet.no [193.71.71.242]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523D237B479; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 01:00:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from login-1.eunet.no (login-1.eunet.no [193.75.110.2]) by mail-relay.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.9.3/GN) with ESMTP id KAA22723; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:00:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) Received: from localhost (mbendiks@localhost) by login-1.eunet.no (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA69358; Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:00:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbendiks@eunet.no) X-Authentication-Warning: login-1.eunet.no: mbendiks owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2000 10:00:44 +0100 (CET) From: Marius Bendiksen To: John Baldwin Cc: Warner Losh , arch@FreeBSD.org, Poul-Henning Kamp Subject: Re: RANDOMDEV inspired realitycheck regarding i386/i486... In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Would anyone have a heart attack if we removed I386_CPU from GENERIC but > did not remove the 386 code? Not really; a 386 will usually require custom installation options anyway. However, I'd appreciate if an installation floppy with just 386/486 could be shipped on the side, stripped of those things not needed for those people. That would resolve the problem nicely. Marius To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message