From owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org  Mon Feb 15 15:07:48 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD0C5AA9693;
 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru
 [46.4.40.135]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA2C1321;
 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lev@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [89.113.128.32])
 (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru)
 by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67AF3A054;
 Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:07:39 +0300 (MSK)
Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ZFS ARC vs Inactive memory on 10-STABLE: is it Ok?
References: <56C1E0B4.5080201@FreeBSD.org>
 <CAMXt9Na5FH50vGpCo_QpD014ye91DVy0KdkNb4ns3NJFLua1hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Saad <nonesuch@longcount.org>
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, FreeBSD-Stable ML <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
From: Lev Serebryakov <lev@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: FreeBSD
Message-ID: <56C1E9BA.3080504@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:07:38 +0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAMXt9Na5FH50vGpCo_QpD014ye91DVy0KdkNb4ns3NJFLua1hA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 15:07:48 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 15.02.2016 17:55, Mark Saad wrote:

> Wow someone else as crazy as I was. :)
...
> I eventually convinced management to move to a automated tape
> library and a normal backup client
 It is my own home NAS, and I need to backup about 2TB offsite (you
could call me paranoid, yes). CrashPlan is almost only offer on the
market I could afford. I will be happy to use tarsnap or rsync.net,
for example, but it is too expensive for me :(

- -- 
// Lev Serebryakov
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=5Vz8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----