Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 08:33:02 -0700 From: markham breitbach <markham@ssimicro.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bhyve / jails network response Message-ID: <8c166f2b-4c40-7a85-d196-7fa9a1598a9c@ssimicro.com> In-Reply-To: <ee187fd6645b7bea3ac3db35bf5014b0.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca> References: <ee187fd6645b7bea3ac3db35bf5014b0.squirrel@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
That is most certainly a DNS issue. You will need to make sure that you have configured a DNS server that can route to your private IP address. -M On 2017-01-16 8:28 AM, James B. Byrne via freebsd-questions wrote: > I am experimenting with a jailed application, Drupal, hosted on a > BHyve VM. Presently this jail responds only to an private IP. Our DNS > is set up to respond to the domain name given to this jail and the > reverse zone is also set up to properly return the domain assigned to > that IPv4. > > When I ping this address using either the domain or the IP from our > LAN I get an immediate response. However, when I ssh into the jail > then it seems to take a significant period of time before I get a > prompt. I would like to determine the source of this delay. > > It is an artefact of running a jail on a VM? > > It is an artefact of sshd running in a jail? > > It there a DNS issue somewhere? > > Is running jails on a VM a generally poor implementation choice. In > other words should one use either Jails on the hardware host or VMs > but not try an run jails within a VM? > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8c166f2b-4c40-7a85-d196-7fa9a1598a9c>