From owner-freebsd-isp  Thu Jul 18 09:20:44 1996
Return-Path: owner-isp
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id JAA29491
          for isp-outgoing; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA29484;
          Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:20:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA09992; Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:20:24 -0700 (PDT)
To: dennis@etinc.com (Dennis)
cc: hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.1.5-RELEASE omission 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 18 Jul 1996 11:10:21 EDT."
             <199607181510.LAA26054@etinc.com> 
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 1996 09:20:24 -0700
Message-ID: <9990.837706824@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-isp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Jordan, 
> 
>        I noticed that our commercial submission to 2.1.5R (our Ethernet 
> Bandwidth Limiter demo), isn't in the distribution. Was this a "selective 
> oversight"? The submission was made on the day of the "last call" and
> It was right next to the netcon stuff which is on there........

What are you talking about?  I see it right here:

jkh@wcarchive-> cd /archive/pub/FreeBSD/2.1.5-RELEASE/commerce/networking/
jkh@wcarchive-> ls
README  etinc   lanstat
jkh@wcarchive-> cat README 
etinc -     Bandwidth manager DEMO
lanstat -   LanStat ethernet statistical lan analyser

Please at least make a minimal effort to verify your claims before
making accusations like this.  There was no "selective oversight"
exercised here, nor would I have omitted it without contacting
you and explaining how or why your submission was unsuitable.

						Jordan