From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jan 13 11:51:55 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) id LAA16252 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 13 Jan 1995 11:51:55 -0800
Received: from seagull.rtd.com (root@Seagull.rtd.com [198.102.68.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.9/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA16246 for <freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 1995 11:51:54 -0800
Received: (from dgy@localhost) by seagull.rtd.com (8.6.9/8.6.9.1) id MAA02345; Fri, 13 Jan 1995 12:51:35 -0700
From: Don Yuniskis <dgy@seagull.rtd.com>
Message-Id: <199501131951.MAA02345@seagull.rtd.com>
Subject: Re: CVS stuff
To: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 1995 12:51:34 -0700 (MST)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freefall.cdrom.com (FreeBSD hackers)
In-Reply-To: <9501131848.AA10722@cs.weber.edu> from "Terry Lambert" at Jan 13, 95 11:48:40 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 295       
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> > A good definition of "not binary":
> > 
> > 	The file has no 0x00 or 0xff in it.
> > 	The last byte is 0x0a
> > 	diff(1) and vi(1) doesn't choke on it.
> 
> This definition would fit a uuencoded binary.
> 
> Is this acceptable?

I believe some of the syscons stuff (fonts?) is so encoded...