From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 4 22:37:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED8237BDBD for ; Tue, 4 Apr 2000 22:37:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.freebsd.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA32009; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 07:37:12 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Greg Lehey Cc: Brad Knowles , Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai , Matthew Dillon , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Vinum breakage (was: 2nd call for reviews and tests: buf->bio patch) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2000 15:02:03 +0930." <20000405150203.B66569@freebie.lemis.com> Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 07:37:12 +0200 Message-ID: <32007.954913032@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20000405150203.B66569@freebie.lemis.com>, Greg Lehey writes: >> >> The problem in vinum/releng4 is the problem greg has been blaming >> on CAM since at least FreeBSDcon and indications seems to be that >> it is actually a malloc/free gottcha in vinum. > >No, this is not correct. The problem you're talking about I blamed >elsewhere, not specifically CAM. To quote from >http://www.lemis.com/vinum/bugs.html: OK, sorry, I havn't heard about it since FreeBSDcon and back then CAM was in the spotlight. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD coreteam member | BSD since 4.3-tahoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message