Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2006 23:03:04 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing <erwin@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DESTDIR implementation [Was:: ATTENTION: is the way DESTDIR was introduced completely wrong?] Message-ID: <20060816210303.GE80138@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20060816202009.GB71853@hades.panopticon> References: <20060814234414.GA57035@hades.panopticon> <44E194BA.2020507@FreeBSD.org> <17634.5246.887894.836856@gromit.timing.com> <20060816173628.GA14848@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060816202009.GB71853@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--BfbbJsf3thGkpLcA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:20:09AM +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > * Both current and nullfs-drived DESTDIR implementations require all > depends in the DESTDIR. But actually BUILD_DEPENDS from host can be > used. >=20 This should already be the case with the current implementation and also will need to be with any new one. The chroot should be used at install time only, thus using BUILD_DEPENDS from the host environment. -erwin --=20 Erwin Lansing http://droso.org Security is like an onion. (o_ _o) It's made up of several layers \\\_\ /_/// erwin@FreeBSD.org And it makes you cry. <____) (____> erwin@aauug.dk --BfbbJsf3thGkpLcA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFE44gHqy9aWxUlaZARAqP4AKDghUDGWr/U+rLX5++f2F7+1EmATACfdiNd RcF/cBz0Der1fMqeJI74Ve8= =rYFL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BfbbJsf3thGkpLcA--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060816210303.GE80138>