From owner-cvs-sys  Wed Dec  3 16:14:04 1997
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-sys>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id QAA26199
          for cvs-sys-outgoing; Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:14:04 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-sys)
Received: from watermarkgroup.com (lor.watermarkgroup.com [207.202.73.33])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA26188;
          Wed, 3 Dec 1997 16:13:54 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from luoqi@watermarkgroup.com)
Received: by watermarkgroup.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA26361; Wed, 3 Dec 97 19:13:22 EST
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 97 19:13:22 EST
From: luoqi@watermarkgroup.com (Luoqi Chen)
Message-Id: <9712040013.AA26361@watermarkgroup.com>
To: cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG, sef@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re:  cvs commit: src/sys/i386/i386 identcpu.c machdep.c trap.c
Sender: owner-cvs-sys@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Should idt vectors 0-5 also be handled by trap_pfault in addition to
the invalid opcode fault? Otherwise, for example, division by 0 will
result in a segmentation fault instead of a SIGFPE.

-lq