From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 19 23:48:53 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CDC8106564A for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from outP.internet-mail-service.net (outp.internet-mail-service.net [216.240.47.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3615A8FC14 for ; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:48:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from idiom.com (mx0.idiom.com [216.240.32.160]) by out.internet-mail-service.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607DE24BA; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:48:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC172D6013; Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:48:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48D43A63.8080808@elischer.org> Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 16:48:51 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M" References: <0DF156EE7414494187B087A3C279BDB40A93F94B@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> <48D2F9B1.8020507@elischer.org> <0DF156EE7414494187B087A3C279BDB40A94021D@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> In-Reply-To: <0DF156EE7414494187B087A3C279BDB40A94021D@XCH-NW-6V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: antipsychic , freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: natd & vimage X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 23:48:53 -0000 Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M wrote: >> please make sure that your fixes go into the vimage branch.. >> we need all the help we can get :-) > > I got the latest vimage branch using cvsup and was able to cleanly apply > my patch, looks like nothing has changed in the divert/mroute files. > Unfortunately it seems that I spoke too soon because my patch locks up > on a dual-core system (I must've been testing with a non-SMP box). So > I'll have to write back when I have something that actually works. > > Another trick, if you just want to nat between vimages, you could > probably use the ng_nat netgraph node... that's why netgraph is the "official" way to connect vimages :-) can you send your diffs anyhow? I never completed the virtualisation of divert. I'll see what I can do with them. > > -Jeff