From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Nov 6 19:20:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDD7C343E8 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:20:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x22f.google.com (mail-qt0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E9D0B309 for ; Sun, 6 Nov 2016 19:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id c47so76154346qtc.2 for ; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:20:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifeofadishwasher.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=re7HPluKXbIJ4canhOc5dD1VkOivZIqzPQWlCaT/Bp4=; b=OE1qUKUmMtyF3LD1o+2VPoWtJkoEX9x0eGMoyoOZgz3uMxtKs0jPST/+dkVgSxVj1H jnbI4E9NRA1HAfz34j39qGuqTX03i/8i97LvTg1njN4iMhyPS3wUfrPdCS33WBJKWSEh 3q4JWL79UdvND0hD7U7t5GOYTKO5dDsReoPLY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=re7HPluKXbIJ4canhOc5dD1VkOivZIqzPQWlCaT/Bp4=; b=AOo9vBZBtkpJdtU6TTNH9UuDSvaaEvNfvpJy4eNY/ineFp3zFer6174BINTUsszgmt WhKHGTZfWqDGGHhCQ8pe5UDoySztQm6GyUuyT7oto87PUfg08thH3Eb3Wa4RaoazaiOI tUk8wyzy4nvfQE4RxxGhrCLJ4Z1i1b0+BW4f4o1KDSbr6/epU6gPdQ7aqIGLP1FNnIB6 3Sl/gSQ7xNFFZDE29fPI/gIUPePr5zi5D+ZV66L0X05c3VdiP2/RAltwV3Bx7DR9opY9 VtXWkWoWrGkX7ERHZ4ucBXLge41EUB37VQSLDBk1lqb6nU5d5yIKPT25/zpmc/bK17MD JdeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngvc9VtBz/zSSIllRpGS7yAdTMHACm78V8LQRierEP8uUjcGnJpjdOUsca5yBxUHAdA== X-Received: by 10.200.57.71 with SMTP id t7mr3563060qtb.59.1478460009056; Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:20:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from lifeofadishwasher.com (c-24-131-227-67.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [24.131.227.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 96sm14278107qkz.40.2016.11.06.11.20.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 06 Nov 2016 11:20:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by lifeofadishwasher.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 06 Nov 2016 14:20:07 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2016 14:20:07 -0500 From: Derek Schrock To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: adamw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: mail/{neo,}mutt: why not packaged with gpgme? Message-ID: <20161106192007.GA71606@ircbsd.lifeofadishwasher.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, adamw@FreeBSD.org References: <20161102204551.jkismaljloqwlokp@box-hlm-03.niklaas.eu> <20161105111452.c76pnuvfloc56r54@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20161105111452.c76pnuvfloc56r54@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2016 19:20:10 -0000 On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 07:14:52AM EDT, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 09:45:51PM +0100, Niklaas Baudet von Gersdorff wrote: > > Hello, > > > > While talking about an issue I have with mail/{neo,}mutt and > > security/gnupg on #gnupg on freenode I was advised to use > > security/gpgme with mutt. I haven't been using gpgme for a while, > > mainly because the packaged versions of both mail/{neo,}mutt have > > it disabled and I was too lazy to compile it on my own. Since > > I got that advice, I've started wondering: > > > > Why is gpgme disabled by default? > > > > As was argued (and as I experienced myself) setting up mutt to > > work with gpgme is much easier than without. Especially gnupg2 > > made it difficult to configure mutt without gpgme. So why not > > enabling gpgme in the packaged versions? > > > > I decided not to create a PR about this request. If that's wrong, > > tell me and I'll create one. > > > > Niklaas > > Actually having tested it, yes you are right it is way more simple, I have > activated it in neomutt > > Best regards, > Bapt I can't find any reason why it was off in mail/mutt, maybe because it was always off since 2006. However, since this appears to be a non-disruptive change, excluding some extra packages being installed, I think it should be turned on for mail/mutt as well. Can this be updated without a PR/patch?