From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 29 06:28:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C141516A4CE; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:28:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from phantom.cris.net (phantom.cris.net [212.110.130.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D796743D2F; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 06:28:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: from phantom.cris.net (ru@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0TESwem021049; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:29:00 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru@FreeBSD.org.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by phantom.cris.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i0TESt4P021044; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:28:55 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ru) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 16:28:54 +0200 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-ID: <20040129142854.GG19899@FreeBSD.org.ua> References: <200401291235.i0TCZBDG036160@repoman.freebsd.org> <6364.1075380217@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6364.1075380217@critter.freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: Bruce Evans cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_glue.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 14:28:35 -0000 --VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 01:43:37PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <200401291235.i0TCZBDG036160@repoman.freebsd.org>, Bruce Evans= write > s: >=20 > > A more complete fix would remove the SYSINIT obfuscation. >=20 > I don't think SYSINIT is very easy to get a grip on and that it > could be improved, but removing it would not improve the situation > IMO. >=20 > I agree that the FIRST/SECOND/ANY order thing is obscure, and that > the general ordering thing is badly thoughtout or at least horribly > implemented. >=20 > The correct solution IMO is probably to record the dependencies > explicitly, but that would require a nomenclature where we can refer > to other sysinits in a sane manner. >=20 > One short-range improvement for the contiguous kernel would be to > abandon linker-sets, and instead generate a C-function at compile > time which people could inspect to see what's going on. >=20 Time for rcorder(9)? ;) Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov FreeBSD committer ru@FreeBSD.org --VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAGRimUkv4P6juNwoRAg7HAJ0RkinzoIl9bLIZ6lMlSQGA+l6sUwCfV3aR k8ZY5Qzim1EavS2PPsrAuTM= =w18X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VbfcI4OLZ4XW0yH2--