From owner-freebsd-security Mon Sep 6 6:15:10 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911EF159AD for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 06:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA23584; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 15:14:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: sheldonh@uunet.co.za, madrapour@hotmail.com, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Tracing open ports on FreeBSD References: <28018.936617908@axl.noc.iafrica.com> <75796.936618453@verdi.nethelp.no> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 06 Sep 1999 15:14:40 +0200 In-Reply-To: sthaug@nethelp.no's message of "Mon, 06 Sep 1999 13:47:33 +0200" Message-ID: Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org sthaug@nethelp.no writes: > > This is the third time I've seen someone try to use netstat to figure > > out who's listening to what. Do you think an xref to sockstat would be > > completely inappropriate in the netstat(1) manpage? > For those versions of FreeBSD where sockstat is installed by default > (at least 3.2-STABLE and newer), I think a reference to sockstat would > be an excellent idea. Look ma, I wrote something *useful*! *grin* DES (author of sockstat) -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message