From owner-freebsd-hardware  Tue Nov  3 09:23:19 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA08677
          for freebsd-hardware-outgoing; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:23:19 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA08654
          for <hardware@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 3 Nov 1998 09:23:16 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
Received: (qmail 20118 invoked by uid 1001); 3 Nov 1998 17:16:23 +0000 (GMT)
To: wpaul@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Call for testers for Macronix fast ethernet driver
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 2 Nov 1998 14:15:11 -0500 (EST)"
References: <199811021915.OAA07892@skynet.ctr.columbia.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 1998 18:16:23 +0100
Message-ID: <20116.910113383@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> Actually, I'm also interested in performance stats for real DEC tulip
> chips with the de driver. I'm wondering how real DEC chips do at 100Mbps
> modes.

Real DEC chips are fully able to saturate a 100 Mbps Ethernet.

I measured this with FreeBSD almost two years ago, actually...

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message