From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Nov 2 08:15:50 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id IAA04815 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 08:15:50 -0800 Received: from fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (Fieber-John.campusview.indiana.edu [149.159.1.34]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA04809 for ; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 08:15:46 -0800 Received: (from jfieber@localhost) by fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu (8.6.12/8.6.12) id LAA26275; Thu, 2 Nov 1995 11:15:36 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 1995 11:15:36 -0500 (EST) From: John Fieber X-Sender: jfieber@fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu To: Satoshi Asami cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dvorak keymap for syscons In-Reply-To: <199511020905.BAA00990@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 2 Nov 1995, Satoshi Asami wrote: > I put together a Dvorak keymap, which I believe is the most "common" > layout ("common" as in, say, distributed by Micro$oft in the DOS 6.22 > supplementary diskette). Will anyone object if I put it in > share/syscons/keymaps? Well, there is Micro$oft dvorak, then there the xdvorak layout (my preferred, and the same as the dvorak layout shipped with an ancient version of DOS) and then one I picked up for the Macintosh which claims to be ANSI dvorak (which i hate). I suppose, given time, I could adapt to this Micro$oft layout. I'd rather not see 3 or 4 dvorak layouts... So, I'd say go for it. -john == jfieber@indiana.edu =========================================== == http://fieber-john.campusview.indiana.edu/~jfieber ============