From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 13 10:22:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CD316A4CE for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:22:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FC043D31 for ; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:21:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4DB051268; Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:21:58 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 03:21:58 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Oliver Brandmueller Message-ID: <20050413102158.GA57881@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050413101418.GB87365@e-Gitt.NET> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050413101418.GB87365@e-Gitt.NET> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: strangeness about netstat -m and mbuf clusters X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 10:22:00 -0000 --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 12:14:18PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: >=20 > Hi everybody, >=20 > I have something real strange about netst -m in RELENG_5: >=20 > caipi# uname -a > FreeBSD caipi 5.4-STABLE FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE #11: Tue Apr 5 13:18:21 CEST= 2005 root@hudson:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/APP i386 >=20 > caipi# netstat -m > 463324 mbufs in use > 4294964312/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/max) > 0/4/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) > 109863 KBytes allocated to network > 0 requests for sfbufs denied > 0 requests for sfbufs delayed > 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile > 323 calls to protocol drain routines See the errata for 5.3, this is still true for later versions. > On all the machines where this happens I also see, that I cannot use vi= =20 > to edit a file on an NFS filesystem. vi simply does nothing, it hangs=20 > and cannot be killed or only after a long time. Using truss is not=20 > possible: "truss: PIOCBIS: Inappropriate ioctl for device" (procfs is=20 > mounted). Using another editor (vim for example) works as expected. Sounds like rpc.lockd is not set up on client and/or server. Kris --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCXPLFWry0BWjoQKURArJ2AKDlHsnnV7pgTbDlwbWbG9Vzh5PyQQCfeT/V Sx9aOv0/TC6CLtaduKQM/Vo= =a0OD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua--