From owner-freebsd-ports Tue May 29 5:30:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ringworld.nanolink.com (ringworld.nanolink.com [195.24.48.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B640137B50B for ; Tue, 29 May 2001 05:30:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roam@orbitel.bg) Received: (qmail 46302 invoked by uid 1000); 29 May 2001 12:29:32 -0000 Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 15:29:32 +0300 From: Peter Pentchev To: Espen Skoglund Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Maintainer note: Please commit ports/27453 Message-ID: <20010529152932.A44050@ringworld.oblivion.bg> Mail-Followup-To: Espen Skoglund , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG References: <15122.34649.427846.394028@i30nb2.ira.uka.de> <15123.31361.988389.672402@i30nb2.ira.uka.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <15123.31361.988389.672402@i30nb2.ira.uka.de>; from esk@ira.uka.de on Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:31:29PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There is yet another solution: choose which port you want to install the file, and modify the other port's Makefile to not install it at all. G'luck, Peter -- This inert sentence is my body, but my soul is alive, dancing in the sparks of your brain. On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 12:31:29PM +0200, Espen Skoglund wrote: > [Espen Skoglund] > > The following PR fixes an mtree problem with devel/arm-elf-gcc295: > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/27453 > > Uhm, wait a minute, it seems that the file added to the plist > (bin/arm-elf-c++filt) was also part of arm-elf-binutils. What should > one do when there are conflicts like this? Should I: > > a) Ignore the file in the gcc plist. This will somehow work since > gcc depends on binutils anyway. It will create errorlogs on > bento, though, and it seems like the wrong thing to do since it > will possibly leave you with files in the system which are > unaccounted for. > > b) Add it to the gcc plist, remove it from the binutils plist, and > manually remove the file from the file system after make install > in arm-elf-binutils. Since arm-elf-gcc295 is probably the only > port which will ever need this file, this seems like a working > solution. It does, however, create a few problems if you > reinstall binutils after gcc has been installed (i.e., file will > be deleted). > > c) Have the file in both plists. Easiest solution. Will ``break'' > binutils if gcc is removed from the system. If gcc is removed > on the other hand, there is probably no other port using > binutils anyway. > > Comments? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message