From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 20 18:39:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7B5106564A for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cbuechler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83F5A8FC0A for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so3861101fxm.13 for ; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:39:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cHObin/j12ZPXmzJk4LLw1IAFAvengCD1txMwjVJpXE=; b=VNAAVhZ3e4UesMnigGVrCZIXDhFTb1BhpqWPLpfY0aA3YXsguE8KeelM/IkzXvcu1u b2sQbjYYf3qEtrrqwDT/GRdGMCoK8U1HNjDo/K9LVh8731j7ecCjrOOSct3Bo1+7HqJw W1B9BHLFs+Rz7ndWiyCUswVU1I+EBZ8dk0M6g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=Ra5mMAeqESKP7xxrx7RL3kvqCFbDDlim3PVFykxYp73CmQugsrTMa2m7x3VuVes8Ku V+F7/FmO2j9/fcDhgy7TcrYbPcjOLSXnrvYvd/MVSBOpe5fGaps6jjoJhzsWUYP8xKFt Ozy6MEHx78BVzTX0xjvgdTEPcVnTv1ZvbFn1c= Received: by 10.223.69.134 with SMTP id z6mr2369442fai.19.1290278372407; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:39:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.102.129 with HTTP; Sat, 20 Nov 2010 10:39:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1989F0C06F24544989EB233736143E7C01F7A854@MX1.heitec.net> References: <1989F0C06F24544989EB233736143E7C01F7A6CC@MX1.heitec.net> <1989F0C06F24544989EB233736143E7C01F7A854@MX1.heitec.net> From: Chris Buechler Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 13:39:12 -0500 Message-ID: To: Holger Rauch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: PF from OpenBSD 4.5 available as patch for 8.1-STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:39:34 -0000 On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Holger Rauch wrote: > Hi Chris, > > thanks for mentioning this. Unfortunately I forgot to mention that the problem doesn't occur when both hosts are on the same subnet (i.e. no firewall in > between, only HP ProCurve switches). > That doesn't invalidate my point - if it works with some NICs but not another, it's highly unlikely to be related to your packet filter.