From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 01:57:48 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: chat@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E429316A41F for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6296843D48 for ; Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:57:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joshua.lokken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i7so998074wra for ; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:57:46 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=raT0/HDWzRDb4Db0qzA/BKw4duXmViF0UlAwnFvQskt/vD9nm7W1y78TQCp2lSXM9iVUZAkaESlUmKAWLsnqv6nMMMie04v5ng8Ey9nTe6uknyB4eelMY13i/QK15i7xT4Up6FWQetONjga9kojZT1vFy+iJ8RkGceN462owg7c= Received: by 10.54.56.55 with SMTP id e55mr4457544wra; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.11.50 with HTTP; Mon, 5 Sep 2005 18:57:46 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 20:57:46 -0500 From: Joshua Lokken To: chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4309FD3D.5030105@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20050820212745.GA2998@night.db.net> <1515C667-4333-4147-BA3E-E04C2ED8382A@HiWAAY.net> <20050820231549.GB3909@night.db.net> <4309FD3D.5030105@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: BSDLinux OS X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 01:57:48 -0000 OP, What's the specific gripe with the FreeBSD kernel, I wonder? Joshua On 8/22/05, Kevin Kinsey wrote:=20 >=20 > Gary W. Swearingen wrote: >=20 > >Perl is actually "dual licensed" and both are bad, IMO, but then > >I doubt that many will want to rewrite the thing anyway. > > > > >=20 > That last phrase produces a bit of a guffaw* ... thanks much! >=20 > KDK >=20 >=20 > *Oh, and I do agree, of course. :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-chat@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-chat > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-chat-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 --=20 Joshua Lokken Open Source Advocate