Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:35:25 -0700 From: "Don O'Neil" <lists@lizardhill.com> To: "'Reko Turja'" <reko.turja@liukuma.net>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Updating Bind & OpenSSL on 6.1-Stable/Release Message-ID: <008f01c77007$cfca1d80$0400020a@mickey> In-Reply-To: <023801c76fe6$0f78e190$0a0aa8c0@rivendell> References: <005d01c76fdd$e67f33a0$0400020a@mickey> <023801c76fe6$0f78e190$0a0aa8c0@rivendell>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I did... So I linked it to /etc/named.conf.... Everything works great now... My question is howver, why are the ports setup different than the original install? I would think that the port build would be set with the same options as the original install that came with the OS... I've seen this before, and it's annoying as heck when you go to patch/update something and it doesn't work because it's installing in a different location and looks for config files in different places. -----Original Message----- From: Reko Turja [mailto:reko.turja@liukuma.net] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 1:34 PM To: Don O'Neil; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating Bind & OpenSSL on 6.1-Stable/Release > My bind install that came on the 6.1 installation runs from /usr/bin, > whereas both the package and the source want to run from > /usr/local/bin... You should have named.conf in /etc/namedb unless there's something funny with the original install. Not sure if you need to run make-localhost script in that directory as I do it as a matter of principle each new system install anyway. If I update SSL/SSH/BIND I set the REPLACE_BASE/OVERWRITE_BASE knob (check the Makefile at ports dir for relevant knob name!) so the updated version will overwrite the older at /usr tree. -Reko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?008f01c77007$cfca1d80$0400020a>