From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun  9 15:15:39 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439AC16A4CE
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2004 15:15:39 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [82.224.56.155])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C301C43D49
	for <arch@freebsd.org>; Wed,  9 Jun 2004 15:15:36 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr)
Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101)
	id 723C32E2A; Wed,  9 Jun 2004 17:15:33 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 17:15:33 +0200
From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
To: arch@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040609151533.GA68949@tara.freenix.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Operating-System: MacOS X / PowerBook G4 - FreeBSD 5.0 / 2x PIII/800 SMP
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Subject: NTP import coming question: location of crypto keys for ntpd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2004 15:15:39 -0000

I'm preparing the upcoming ntp 4.2.0 import into what-will-be 5.3 and am
wondering on this.  In the past, the preconfigured location for crypto keys
is "/usr/local/etc", in-sync with what is used by the net/ntp port.

For the base system, I was thinking of maybe change it to something close
to "/etc/ntp" (in line with /etc/ppp & /etc/ssh).

Is it worth the HEADS-UP/UPDATING note I'd need to put or do I just keep it
that way?

PS: they have renamed a lot of files from .htm to .html (I hate such
gratuituous changes) and I must say that Arch[1] made it very easy to see
the changes & renames...

-----
[1] http://gnuarch.org/ a distributed VCS close to BitKeeper but free.
-- 
Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
Darwin snuadh.freenix.org Kernel Version 7.4.0: Wed May 12 16:58:24 PDT 2004