From nobody Tue Jun 1 12:00:17 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190D2E7204F for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:00:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from smtp.osorio.me (mvd.osorio.me [5.196.94.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FvW1w1b8Xz4qmg for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:00:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ros@bebik.net) Received: from [192.168.69.184] (unknown [78.194.61.125]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.osorio.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD9871212D0 for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 12:00:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Rodrigo Osorio Subject: Re: Cacti 1.2.17 References: <890d29ec-4b9c-3c39-353f-0196e1e5743f@netfence.it> To: FreeBSD ports Message-ID: <8c19f9a9-e85f-60cb-c44f-87f4fcfbd321@bebik.net> Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 14:00:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.9.0 List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-ports List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4FvW1w1b8Xz4qmg X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ros@bebik.net designates 5.196.94.126 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=ros@bebik.net X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.19 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bebik.net]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[5.196.94.126:from:127.0.2.255]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.989]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:5.196.0.0/16, country:FR]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-ports]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[78.194.61.125:received] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 6/1/21 11:06 AM, Li-Wen Hsu wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:55 PM Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> Hello. >> >> Sorry to bother... >> Cacti was recently upgraded, fixing some security issues. >> >> Are you working on updating the port? >> Is this something trivial I could do myself? Or perhaps you already >> tried and there's some showstopper? > This seems like a minor version update, which *might* be easy, but > computers usually surprise humans. > > I would suggest you start with trying to update the version number in > Makefile, and distinfo file (`make makesum`), then checking if the > patches are still valid. Then build, install and test. > > The full document is at > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/porters-handbook/ > > Best, > Li-Wen > Hi, I open an issue this morning with a patch to upgrade cacti, and I can confirm that as expected the update wasn't that easy at least for a first try. Andrea, I didn't test that much the resulting package so feel free to grab the patch, test it, and give us your feedback on the PR. BTW Let us know if you need some help building the port. This is the PR link for cacti: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=256325 All the best, -- rodrigo