From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 28 07:25:45 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA21507 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 28 May 1998 07:25:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (spinner.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA21464; Thu, 28 May 1998 07:25:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au) Received: from spinner.netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.netplex.com.au (8.8.8/8.8.8/Spinner) with ESMTP id WAA08282; Thu, 28 May 1998 22:23:26 +0800 (WST) (envelope-from peter@spinner.netplex.com.au) Message-Id: <199805281423.WAA08282@spinner.netplex.com.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Peter Wemm cc: Dom Mitchell , current@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Sendmail 8.9 In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 28 May 1998 21:41:27 +0800." <199805281341.VAA08110@spinner.netplex.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 22:23:26 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I wrote: > Dom Mitchell wrote: > > Wouldn't it be easier to just stick with 8.8.8 until the licensing > > issues of this latest sendmail can be clarified? > > Yes, that's pretty much what is happening by default. I have asked the > sendmail people twice now about this and still have got no response. I > might try sending by fax next. I find it quite ironic that people setting > up to sell sendmail don't have a handle on email. Argh, I take that back, I shouldn't have uttered such crap, especially when I had a reply in my mailbox that I had not yet seen. (And even if it wasn't, this still wasn't appropriate). My big mouth is really going to get me in trouble sooner or later. So, my apologies, especially to the sendmail folks. (I have had a Really Bad Day, not that it's any excuse). -Peter To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message