From owner-freebsd-bugs  Sat Jan 22 15:44:25 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
Received: from kot.ne.mediaone.net (kot.ne.mediaone.net [24.218.15.190])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 63DDA14C3A; Sat, 22 Jan 2000 15:44:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net)
Received: from rtfm.newton (mi@rtfm.newton [10.10.0.1])
	by kot.ne.mediaone.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA99871;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:13 -0500 (EST)
From: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>
X-Relay-IP: 10.10.0.1
Received: (from mi@localhost)
	by rtfm.newton (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA87919;
	Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:12 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net)
Message-Id: <200001222344.SAA87919@rtfm.newton>
Subject: Re: kern/13644
In-Reply-To: From "(env:" "mi)" at "Dec 28, 1999 09:55:47 am"
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2000 18:44:12 -0500 (EST)
Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>,
	Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>, jasone@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG,
	lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7w<gv/&E-lL7twZCT8B~/PA4|\t$ti+22K">
	 hJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<kcG^EOVih
	 y+z3/UR{6SCQ
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

I did not see  a single reply, so I'm replying  to myself. Shouldn't the
PR be resurrected?

	-mi

mi once stated:
=From mi Tue Dec 28 09:55:47 1999
=Subject: Re: kern/13644
=In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912281659210.9558-100000@alphplex.bde.org> from
=	Bruce Evans at "Dec 28, 1999 05:03:47 pm"
=To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
=Date: Tue, 28 Dec 1999 09:55:47 -0500 (EST)
=CC: Mikhail Teterin <mi@kot.ne.mediaone.net>, jasone@FreeBSD.ORG, 
=	freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, 
=	lawlopez@cisco.com, jseger@FreeBSD.ORG
=X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL60 (25)]

=FreeBSD:
==> => 	If timeout is a non-nil  pointer, it specifies a maximum
==> => 	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
=
=Solaris:
==> 	If timeout is not a NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum
==> 	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
=
=Linux:
==> 	timeout is an upper bound  on the amount of time elapsed
==> 	before select returns.
=
=Irix (http://reality.sgi.com/cgi-bin/getman/?select):
=	If timeout is a non-zero pointer, it specifies a maximum
=	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
=
=BSDI (http://www.bsdi.com/bsdi-man?proto=1.1&apropos=0&msection=2&query=select):
=	If timeout is a non-NULL pointer, it specifies a maximum
=	interval to wait for the selection to complete.
=
=Perl 5.004 (http://man.cs.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/man?OS=alpha&command=select):
=	TIMEOUT is  the maximum  amount of  time to  wait before
=	returning an empty list.
=
=It seems, all of the documentation (including the FreeBSD's) agrees. The
=FreeBSD's implementation disagrees...
=
=	-mi



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message