From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 28 17:08:19 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC5FA1065676 for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9558FC0A for ; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (a83-160-85-125.adsl.xs4all.nl [83.160.85.125]) by smtp-vbr15.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q3SH7fVU078191 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:07:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q3SH7fDB024060; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:07:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 19:07:41 +0200 (CEST) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: Warren Block In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201204280537.42277.lumiwa@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Kevin Oberman , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Odd mouse issue with new xorg-server X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 17:08:19 -0000 On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, the wise Warren Block wrote: > It should be possible to make that the sole entry in xorg.conf: > > Section "ServerLayout" > Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" > EndSection > > Defaults will be used for the rest. (I have not tried this, though.) Removing the lines about input devices results in not starting at all (no screens found). > Another option which people seem to miss is to just build xorg-server > with the HAL option disabled. At least for xfce, HAL is not required > and provides no benefits, so why run it? Hal is required for a lot of applications. I have a scanner which uses xsane to scan, and this requires hal. Regards, Marco -- We had it tough ... I had to get up at 9 o'clock at night, half an hour before I went to bed, eat a lump of dry poison, work 29 hours down mill, and when we came home our Dad would kill us, and dance about on our grave singing Hallelujah ... -- Monty Python