Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:18:05 -0700 From: Anton Afanasyev <aasoft@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Thomas-Martin Seck <tmseck@web.de>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Quick status update on Squid 3.x ports Message-ID: <CAEAhP2iJ0R728W30t55nVjxSyXDXTYCLvykNC1E4BjJZdY46jg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5063FB36.8080906@yandex.ru> References: <20120927052202.GA2077@wcfields.tmseck.homedns.org> <5063FB36.8080906@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru>wrote:
> First thank you for working on this. According to squid web-page, 3.2 is
> the only stable version ("Current versions suitable for production use."),
> that is actively maintained. 3.1 and less are listed in "Old versions -
> Provided for archival purposes only. Not intended for general use in new
> installations". Is there still 2.7 users?! As for me, 3.2 should go to
> www/squid and some kind of exp-run should be done to make sure the ports
> depending on it builds fine.
>
>
There are bound to be at least some 2.7 users who are waiting for all 2.7's
features to be implemented in the 3.x branch. e.g. an equivalent of
url_rewrite_program doesn't exist in pre-3.2.
Anton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAEAhP2iJ0R728W30t55nVjxSyXDXTYCLvykNC1E4BjJZdY46jg>