Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 07:14:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 219840] [NEW PORT] devel/bazel_clang38: using clang38 as default crosstool Message-ID: <bug-219840-13-EIbszN52bE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-219840-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-219840-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D219840 --- Comment #8 from Klaus Aehlig <aehlig@linta.de> --- 1. is entirely up to the committer, but keep in mind that committer can com= mit patches to other ports as a preparation step; as mentioned, I don't have any objections to this change (but I'm not a committer). 2. Why not use the EXTRA_PATCHES +=3D construct? (Side remark: your pull request was sent after bazel 0.5.2 baseline was cut= and for 0.5.3 we're still in time, so the time for review did not at all influe= nce which bazel releases contain that patch.) In the end, I can live with the fork, but I don't think it's good for the p= orts tree to duplicate instead of reuse. But that, again, is up to the committer= s to decide. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-219840-13-EIbszN52bE>