From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Mar 25 23:33:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA22955 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:33:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA22950 for ; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:33:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by root.com (8.8.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id XAA10959; Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:35:11 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199703260735.XAA10959@root.com> X-Authentication-Warning: implode.root.com: localhost [127.0.0.1] didn't use HELO protocol To: "Jeffrey J. Mountin" cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: The jump to 3 In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 26 Mar 1997 01:12:51 CST." <3.0.32.19970326011251.00d3e4ac@mixcom.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Tue, 25 Mar 1997 23:35:11 -0800 Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >At 06:50 AM 3/25/97 -0800, David Greenman wrote: >>>If this was asked and answered before I do apologize to everyone. >>> >>>Im just curious - why after stepping 2.0, 2.1, 2.2 (etc) is freeBSD going >>>to 3.0? >> >> The 3.0 release will have SMP support and this is a major change in >>technology that needs a bump in the major version number. > >What does SMP stand for? > >I'm acronym'd out right now. Symetric Multi-Processing. ...the ability to have multiple CPUs simultaneously executing processes on a machine. -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project