From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 6 12:14:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACBA16A41C; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:14:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [83.167.185.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8EE43D49; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 12:14:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24A1D651F7; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:12:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 94191-04; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:12:36 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (host81-134-123-217.in-addr.btopenworld.com [81.134.123.217]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC33651EE; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:12:36 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AC59E6266; Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:14:33 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2005 13:14:33 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Jim Rees Message-ID: <20050606121433.GE734@empiric.icir.org> References: <20050606105100.AFFBA1BBF8@citi.umich.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050606105100.AFFBA1BBF8@citi.umich.edu> Cc: current@freebsd.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] IFS: Inode FileSystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2005 12:14:39 -0000 On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 06:51:00AM -0400, Jim Rees wrote: > OpenAFS could benefit from something like IFS, although I'm not volunteering > to do the work. The client has complicated code to keep its thousands of > cache files in a hierarchy just to reduce name lookup time, and the server > originally used a special "open by inode" system call that had been hacked > in to the kernel. And it looks like we as a project are eating our words now, which is no bad thing:- http://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2000/11/28/0030.html :-) Regards, BMS