From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Aug  5 16:28:14 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA12461
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vader.cs.berkeley.edu (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12445
          for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:28:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost) by vader.cs.berkeley.edu (8.8.6/8.7.3) id QAA07089; Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 1997 16:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708052328.QAA07089@vader.cs.berkeley.edu>
To: Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br
CC: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <032564EA.006C9FB5.00@papagaio.voga.com.br> (Daniel_Sobral@voga.com.br)
Subject: Re: Fetchmail
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * I was wondering... Wouldn't fetchmail make a valuable addition to the bin
 * distribution? Not to mention that

It may be valuable to some, but not to many others.  That's what ports
are for. :)

Besides, that thing moves way too fast.  (Try "cvs log" on the master
Makefile!)

Satoshi