Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 20:52:51 +0000 From: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> To: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> Cc: "office@freebsd.org" <office@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Bumping libreoffice Message-ID: <CADLo838jvOnwGJChc1RdyRL4cGe2pELRp6qhpQeHzN4wmdQxsw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <51156220.4040207@bsdforen.de> References: <511548F2.4030303@bsdforen.de> <20130208201926.GB55651@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130208203538.GA57852@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <51156220.4040207@bsdforen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 8 February 2013 20:37, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de> wrote: > On 08/02/2013 21:35, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 09:19:27PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 07:50:26PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>>> Please take note of Porters' Handbook section 5.2.2.1. >>>> >>>> Build fixes are NOT a reason to bump portrevision! >>>> >>> >>> >>> Have a look at the history Jung-uk has never done any graticious bump on this >>> port. >>> >>> I personnally resigned on maintaining LibreOffice exactly because of reactions >>> like this one, (also because Jung-uk Kim is actually doing a far better job on >>> it than me :)). >>> >>> regards, >>> Bapt >> >> >> Sorry I probably over-reacted because I still remember the frustrations from >> when I maintained LibreOffice. > > No, I'm grateful for you telling me that my e-mail was offensive. > I'd just like to know how it offended, so that I can avoid this > in the future. I've replied privately. Chris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo838jvOnwGJChc1RdyRL4cGe2pELRp6qhpQeHzN4wmdQxsw>