From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 8 09:47:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A0A16A4CE for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:47:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D58C43D39 for ; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 09:47:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (p60233-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [220.96.142.233]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9484B6EA8; Sat, 8 Jan 2005 18:47:04 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:46:40 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050108.184640.126765493.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: q@uni.de From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20050107231315.GA894@galgenberg.net> References: <20050106.211859.07597771.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> <20050107231315.GA894@galgenberg.net> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.1.53 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__8_18_46_40_2005_343)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: teTeX 2.99.8 patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 09:47:06 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__8_18_46_40_2005_343)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote in <20050107231315.GA894@galgenberg.net>: q> Not much luck here, first of all, I noticed, that teTeX-base now depends q> on texihtml, however you are passing these CONFIGURE_ARGS: q> + --without-texinfo \ q> + --without-texi2html \ q> q> So is texihtml necessary or not? texi2html is a part of the teTeX distribution, but it is disabled in build time with --without-texi2html to use textproc/texi2html instead. q> The pkg-plist change for teTeX-texmf seems excessive. Is 1MB diff really q> necessary? I do not think this is a problem. This is mainly because in teTeX3 the install directory has been changed from share/texmf to share/texmf-dist. q> But lets do the runtime errors I encountered (just some quick tests). I q> patch my ports-tree, ran make index, then portupgrade teTeX\* dvipsk-tetex Hmmm, I forgot to add a patch for tex-texmflocal and bump PORTREVISION of print/xdvik. I put the revised patch, so could you please try this? http://people.allbsd.org/~hrs/FreeBSD/teTeX3.2.diff.gz Thank you for the report. I think other problems you reported are due to lack of the necessary changes in the previous patch. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__8_18_46_40_2005_343)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB36wDTyzT2CeTzy0RAhxvAJ9Q4zeXghCWvqJ8FjEY8Y7BBYeNCACePl+G 08gu5/FyuI6/5mKnW9Oyo70= =Pv3E -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sat_Jan__8_18_46_40_2005_343)----