From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 24 00:03:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C8CC1065670 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F8F18FC25 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20120 invoked by uid 399); 24 Nov 2010 00:03:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO doug-optiplex.ka9q.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Nov 2010 00:03:09 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4CEC563C.80205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:03:08 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/ User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101028 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?= References: <201011212351.oALNpTti096816@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <4CE9B77B.20007@FreeBSD.org> <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <8639qt1mx1.fsf@ds4.des.no> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 00:03:11 -0000 On 11/22/2010 05:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Doug Barton writes: >> As far as I can tell the current state of the code builds just fine, >> so I'm wondering what the current problem with the tinderbox is. > > No weasel words, please. None intended. My post was sent what I felt was a sufficient time after the commit of the fix that I was genuinely curious, especially given the history of c[v]sup related problems on the tinderbox infrastructure. Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/