From nobody Thu Apr 7 05:09:37 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164441A8DCC7 for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 05:09:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@tinka.africa) Received: from the-host.tinka.africa (the-host.tinka.africa [105.22.37.14]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4KYqF81k9gz4cms for ; Thu, 7 Apr 2022 05:09:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@tinka.africa) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tinka.africa; s=tinka; h=In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Content-Type:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8PoDfFQQqr9d0WtQoO501NC/moYABkLxziNfa559auQ=; b=lzGU7vZI/bpWpMnTLH/QdK36C b7ErkFc7J6Hy6cJx2dGEoH2Q1ZudI7pLg/ZmbEI7WWzt3ID11A8g8seRhiHWj7WdhvRDoxPTVxn/e 6y8GtE+1tZPa6BMaDCJPGEhwpheDUmBz0o38nif//D1fWkVVArjlSIbpl+OvM6vc5RnQZ9rIMbF4T 5HO/UPiXXoJ9ioekAgQMoTwK5P9jiCyUAchDk+UHTIurFqjJzbTP4/HOnQlZNCMHdyIODNfK+j7Ed AnEUHp9Hqv8Dm3ziJQZkl4SChk60dV9HdGb6faLwIU56EZO1NQqT1gZ9gjcX9xWvJZf38X/wSLlzm vgtVW/Dng==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by the-host.tinka.africa with esmtp (Exim 4.92.1) (envelope-from ) id R9YEC4-0007SN-C0; Thu, 07 Apr 2022 07:09:40 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------xHKxza0e50oirmhsukJRgYqH" Message-ID: <8d1e18fb-9888-25bb-87dd-b3ac2f47559f@tinka.africa> Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 07:09:37 +0200 List-Id: User questions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-questions List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.7.0 Subject: Re: libxml2 Port Blocking Upgrades Content-Language: en-US To: Kevin Oberman Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" References: <77f02d06-0252-e8d2-f53f-0fa39fc0d58b@tinka.africa> From: Mark Tinka In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4KYqF81k9gz4cms X-Spamd-Bar: -- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=tinka.africa header.s=tinka header.b=lzGU7vZI; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=tinka.africa; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of mark@tinka.africa designates 105.22.37.14 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=mark@tinka.africa X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.00 / 15.00]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:105.22.37.14]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[tinka.africa:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; HFILTER_HELO_2(1.00)[the-host.tinka.africa]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[tinka.africa,none]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:37100, ipnet:105.16.0.0/12, country:MU]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[tinka.africa:s=tinka]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[mark]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-questions]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------xHKxza0e50oirmhsukJRgYqH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 4/7/22 01:22, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I don't think that 262853 is the source of the problem, though I'm not > sure from the provided information. A build with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE and > some earlier bit of the log MIGHT make this clearer. I tried this, and the issue was exactly the same. > As far as I can tell, the libxml2 port does not install any .a libs, > only the shareables (.so). True. On systems that were not affected by this, no .a libs exist. On others that are, .a libs are being looked for, and since they don't exist, the update stops. > > In any case, I re-installed libxslt one minute and 25 seconds after > the libxml2 commit with no issues on my 13-Stable system. I tried this and it didn't work either. libxslt is still looking for libxml2.a Mark. --------------xHKxza0e50oirmhsukJRgYqH Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 4/7/22 01:22, Kevin Oberman wrote:


I don't think that 262853 is the source of the problem, though I'm not sure from the provided information. A build with MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE and some earlier bit of the log MIGHT make this clearer.

I tried this, and the issue was exactly the same.


As far as I can tell, the libxml2 port does not install any .a libs, only the shareables (.so).

True. On systems that were not affected by this, no .a libs exist. On others that are, .a libs are being looked for, and since they don't exist, the update stops.



In any case, I re-installed libxslt one minute and 25 seconds after the libxml2 commit with no issues on my 13-Stable system.

I tried this and it didn't work either. libxslt is still looking for libxml2.a

Mark.
--------------xHKxza0e50oirmhsukJRgYqH--